From 7 to 10 May 2025, the world watched with unease as nuclear-armed neighbours India and Pakistan engaged in a rapid and intense military confrontation. In just four days, the conflict brought to the surface long-standing tensions, untested weapons platforms, and a fierce information war that spilled beyond borders and into financial markets. While both sides declared victory, the reality was far more complex.
What Sparked the Conflict?
The latest flashpoint emerged from the disputed region of Jammu and Kashmir. In early April 2025, a deadly terrorist attack in India’s Pahalgam region, allegedly carried out by militants based in Pakistan, left dozens dead and reignited simmering hostilities. In response, India launched “Operation Sindoor” — a precision airstrike campaign targeting what it claimed were terrorist infrastructure sites across the Line of Control (LoC). Pakistan retaliated almost immediately with “Operation Bunyan-ul-Marsus,” a defensive and counter-offensive manoeuvre designed to repel Indian aggression and assert sovereignty.
Despite international calls for restraint, the limited war quickly escalated to airstrikes, missile launches, and the deployment of unmanned systems, including armed drones. By May 10, both nations agreed to a ceasefire, which was broken in part by the United States. The damage, however, was already done — militarily, diplomatically, and economically.
What Happened During the Conflict?
India’s Offensive: India initiated the conflict with a barrage of precision strikes using indigenous BrahMos cruise missiles and French-made Rafale jets equipped with SCALP missiles. Targets included alleged terror camps and key infrastructure in Pakistan-administered Kashmir. Indian officials claimed their mission objectives were met and that the operation was a necessary response to cross-border terrorism.
Pakistan’s Counterstrike: Pakistan’s military launched Operation Bunyan-ul-Marsus, scrambling its newly acquired Chinese-made J-10C fighter jets and domestically produced JF-17s. They claimed to have shot down multiple Indian jets, including at least one Rafale, and struck back with Fatah-series guided missiles. Pakistan also deployed Chinese-origin armed drones, reportedly flying them deep into Indian airspace.
Casualties and Losses: While official numbers remain disputed, open-source intelligence and international observers estimate that over 150 people — both combatants and civilians — died during the conflict. India reportedly lost at least two aircraft (including a Rafale and a Su-30MKI), while Pakistan suffered damage to several military installations. Civilian casualties were especially high in Pakistan, with reports of at least 40 non-combatant deaths.
The Battle of Narratives
Beyond the battlefield, a second war raged — one of public relations. Each side rolled out its own version of success:
- India characterised its actions as counter-terrorism operations, framing itself as a responsible power confronting extremist threats. Indian media largely supported this stance, focusing on the surgical nature of the strikes and highlighting India’s technological superiority and restraint.
- Pakistan cast itself as the victim of unprovoked aggression, stressing civilian casualties and its military’s defensive success. The Pakistani military claimed to have downed six Indian jets without losing any of its own — a claim challenged by international observers but widely circulated in local and Chinese state-run media.
This war of words had global implications. Stocks of Chinese defense contractors surged temporarily following Pakistani claims of successful use of Chinese weapons, only to fall sharply once ceasefire terms were confirmed. Indian defence stocks initially dipped on rumours of aircraft losses but rebounded post-conflict amid nationalist confidence and government affirmations of indigenous defence success.
Lessons from the Four-Day War
- Perception Shapes Reality: In today’s media-saturated landscape, the narrative can sometimes have more impact than battlefield outcomes. Both governments controlled messaging tightly, recognising that perception would influence not just public opinion, but also global markets and diplomatic leverage.
- Weaponry Under the Spotlight: The conflict served as a real-world testbed for a range of weapons systems — from China’s J-10C and PL-15 missiles to India’s Rafales and BrahMos. For defence observers and manufacturers alike, it offered critical insights into capabilities, limitations, and the evolving theatre of air warfare.
- Information Warfare Is Here to Stay: Misinformation spread rapidly during the conflict, often preceding official confirmations. False claims of destroyed S-400 systems or exaggerated aircraft losses impacted stock prices and stoked public sentiment. This underscores the need for critical media literacy and transparent, timely government communication during crises.
- No Winners in Escalation: Despite both sides declaring strategic success, the toll on lives, infrastructure, and regional stability was undeniable. The conflict revealed how quickly limited engagements can spiral, especially in a region with two nuclear-armed states.
Conclusion
The May 2025 conflict between India and Pakistan was short but deeply instructive. As both nations recalibrate in its aftermath, it serves as a stark reminder that modern warfare is as much about missiles as it is about messages. In the age of media dominance and global financial interconnectedness, managing the narrative may well shape the outcomes of future conflicts just as much as firepower on the ground.
RELATED: Mavic 4 Pro: DJI’s Triple-Lens Powerhouse Reimagines Aerial Creativity
Join the conversations on TheHomeGround Asia’s Facebook and Instagram, and get the latest updates via Telegram.
